> Then why be against it? Why not say “look, we enacted 90% top marginal rate and it hasn’t helped at all?” Can you expand on this? Why would you want to put a

> Then why be against it? Why not say “look, we enacted 90% top marginal rate and it hasn’t helped at all?” Can you expand on this? Why would you want to put a policy on the books, dealing with its side effects without achieving its objective? You're saying this as if it's obvious; to me, it's anything but.