4 ms·
> Best case: you make a ton of money by selling to actual businesses (rather than annoying geeks and other weirdos who dare use uncommon clients); slightly-wors
by worble 6y ago
> Best case: you make a ton of money by selling to actual businesses (rather than annoying geeks and other weirdos who dare use uncommon clients); slightly-worse case: you sell it to MS.
And worst case: MS change how things work and block this sort of thing happening again. You now have a bunch of angry customers with a hack that doesn't work.
I'm no lawyer, so I'd also check the legal implications of selling something that builds on top and modifies Microsofts application without their explicit consent.
- marcoperaza 6y agoThere's a big market for Office add-ins. API docs: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/office/dev/add-ins/outlook/apis https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/office/dev/add-ins/outlook/...
- toyg 6y agoAdd-ons are allowed, even welcomed by MS. Of course, the trade-offs of "sharecropping" on someone else's platform are always there, from a strategic point of view. MS can wake up one day and rewrite Outlook in Rust, forcing you to rewrite from scratch or making it impossible in practice. But it's a possibility much more remote, imho, than the chance of making significant money with yet another exotic mail client.