4 ms·
>You know we can just literally choose to not have this problem, instead of buying into other people's narratives. Try saying this after a few months of lockdo
by ddxxdd 6y ago
>You know we can just literally choose to not have this problem, instead of buying into other people's narratives.
Try saying this after a few months of lockdown, when a severely damaged economy leads to food shortages, and printing money does nothing to help.
- pgsbathhouse2 6y agoSo you believe the ability to produce food, which we've historically produced too much of and let go to waste, is just going to poof into thin air because a select portion of the population doesn't have money flow. What a ridiculous statement.
- dlp211 6y agoThere is no evidence that we are headed toward food shortages. We actually have surpluses. The issue now and in the future is one of alignment and market forces.
- ddxxdd 6y agoThe economy cannot be modelled as a linear system; it is a pseudo-chaotic system. If one poorly-chosen element is labelled as a "non-essential business", it can cause all the other metaphorical Jenga blocks to collapse.
- jfnixon 6y agoYeah, this is just like the WHO announcing "no evidence" antibodies provide some immunity. It just means no one has done a scientific study of how to collapse the food supply on a massive scale. These sorts of "everything is peachy neat keeno" claims are like Fauci saying the "risk to the US is low" back in February. There is a nontrivial risk we are headed toward food shortages. We should get back in a safer, more well understood configuration for food production and distribution.