4 ms·

> I'm pretty sure QNX could do this in the 1990s. Plan 9, SmallTalk

• imglorp 6y ago
  Erlang of course. All spawns and messages can be local or remote.
  • masklinn 6y ago
    Indeed, weird to only find it that low as a sub-comment: spawn(Node, Module, Function, Args) -> pid() Returns the process identifier (pid) of a new process started by the application of Module:Function to Args on Node. If Node does not exist, a useless pid is returned. Otherwise works like spawn/3.
  • russellbeattie 6y ago
    Any time I see something about remote processes, I immediately think, "Erlang could probably do this." I think Erlang would have been the programming language of the 21st century... If only the syntax wasn't like line noise and a printer error code had a baby, and raised it to think like Lisp.
    • sosodev 6y ago
      Elixir is pretty cool. You get all the power of Erlang wrapped up in a much more developer friendly language.