3 ms·
Doesn’t that mean that 57% were symptomatic?
by danieltillett 6y ago
Doesn’t that mean that 57% were symptomatic?
- FiberBundle 6y agoI didn't intend to contradict you. Granted it's totally valid to assume that many people who are tested positive and show no symptoms might develop some later, but I just thought it might be of interest to some people to have numbers where they tested patients twice over a long enough interval to conclude that they really were asymptomatic.