4 ms·
> Given the vast number of surveillance cameras I saw last time in London, I doubt this would add significantly to their capabilities either. The majority of C
by multjoy 6y ago
> Given the vast number of surveillance cameras I saw last time in London, I doubt this would add significantly to their capabilities either.
The majority of CCTV is privately owned. The vast majority of CCTV is not proactively monitored. Tracking someone using London CCTV is someone staring at a screen for a number of hours trying to follow them on playback.
I’ve had the joy of recreating someone’s movements in a nightclub from CCTV. A 6 hour night out took me days to reconstruct, and that’s using a small number of cameras in a well defined area.
CCTV as a mass surveillance tool just doesn’t work.
- omnimus 6y agoIt would work if it was centrally owned and with camera on every corner. I agree that privately owned cameras are fine. But we have to be very careful what we allow in future.
- cmendel 6y ago>Tracking someone using London CCTV is someone staring at a screen for a number of hours trying to follow them on playback. It is until it isn't. Soon it will be a ML system and it will be possible, then what?