3 ms·
I don't know why you're using objdump instead of -S to have gcc generate assembly directly. You get named constants and named labels that way, and you can even
by msla 7y ago
I don't know why you're using objdump instead of -S to have gcc generate assembly directly.
You get named constants and named labels that way, and you can even choose the sane Intel syntax with -masm=intel which you can also do with objdump.
- kragen 7y agoI like -Wa,-adhlns=foo.lst -g to see the C, asm, and machine code all together.