4 ms·
This post baffles me. Your first point accurately describes this article as misleading/wrong, then in your second point you wish it was easier to pay for their
by Damorian 6y ago
This post baffles me. Your first point accurately describes this article as misleading/wrong, then in your second point you wish it was easier to pay for their wrong opinions. If I'm paying for news and opinion pieces, it better be the highest quality, and I've never been impressed with the organizations that try to paywall their content, at least not more than other mainstream news organizations.
- tyre 6y agoBut the article isn't wrong. The article is talking about minimum monthly payments, which _isn't_ happening every month. Paying for the article would allow the GP to read the article and see that
- MattGaiser 6y agoThe headline is uninformative. Now that I have read the article, the article is informative. My initial assessment was incorrect. I assumed it was about people not paying balances. It is actually about people not paying minimums, i.e. they can't even carry their debt, yet alone pay it off.