He is committed to Assange's cause, that's right. However he allowed very precious information on how the trial was held to reach the public. This is why his

He is committed to Assange's cause, that's right. However he allowed very precious information on how the trial was held to reach the public. This is why his reporting, while not neutral, is very important. I have not used the term "journalist" but reporter in the original title. Is "reporter" inaccurate too in your opinion?