3 ms·
I have clarified my original definition, that would be self defense, in the same way that if someone tries to coerce a knife into your throat, you can coerce th
by oDot 6y ago
I have clarified my original definition, that would be self defense, in the same way that if someone tries to coerce a knife into your throat, you can coerce their face to the pavement.
- krapp 6y agoYou can redefine terms any way you like, but coercion in response to coercion is still coercion. That's not an "economy void of coercion", just one where the monopoly on violence has been replaced by a free market of violence. After all, if the person squatting on what you consider to be your property doesn't recognize your claim of ownership, it would seem that you pose a greater threat to them than they do to you, especially if you're trying to remove them from the property when they're not presenting an immediate threat of physical harm.
- eeZah7Ux 6y agoThat's a quite an arbitrary definition of self defense