3 ms·
This is great! In re: time is money, it's even worse than that: attention is money. The quality of time varies with the "self-remembrance" if you will. - - -
by carapace 7y ago
This is great!
In re: time is money, it's even worse than that: attention is money.
The quality of time varies with the "self-remembrance" if you will.
- - - -
Take time to "pop the 'why?' stack. In practice many of us are "yak
shaving" and wasting a lot of time and effort on "low-leverage" actions.
> yak shaving
> [MIT AI Lab, after 2000: orig. probably from a Ren & Stimpy episode.]
Any seemingly pointless activity which is actually necessary to solve
a problem which solves a problem which, several levels of recursion
later, solves the real problem you're working on.
~http://catb.org/jargon/html/Y/yak-shaving.html http://catb.org/jargon/html/Y/yak-shaving.html
- - - -
The most metal programmers I know type hella fast. One guy in our
office, we would play hangman and the only way to beat him was to figure
out the word before he did, because the millisecond his brain "got it"
you would hear a small explosion as he typed the word on his clicky
keyboard in a single motion. If you figured out the word at the same
time as he did he won. SOB could also write bug-free C++ by the page. At speed.
Another guy I knew had a tiling WM and only used terminals. A vim man,
he could type slightly faster then the system could respond, emitting a
single stream of characters that flowed smoothly from vim to wm to
shell and back again, his locus of attention flying around too
fast to follow even if you knew what he was doing (editing and
recompiling or whatever.)
- - - -
(Ooooo... Major points off for deep linking to XKCD without attribution.
Bad pool. It's probably one of the most important and useful
XKCD comicS. "Here’s an old comic..." ah, that's cold blooded.)
Other than that, this is the best general advice for programmers that
I've seen for a while. Yay!
- hackeryogi 7y agoDoes xkcd even need attribution? I was sure most readers would recognise the art (if not the comic) :) Point taken and corrected (noob blogger mistakes!) Thanks!
- carapace 7y agoYou're a scholar and a gentleman! Well met! ("Does xkcd even need attribution?" Sir? https://xkcd.com/1053/ https://xkcd.com/1053/ would you forego the delight of being the one who introduced somebody to XKCD? (^_^) <3 )
- hackeryogi 7y agoYou, sir, seem to have a xkcd catalogued in your head much better than I do. Thank you sensei ! Well met indeed :)
- maxpshaw 7y agoYou mentioned "if one person on a team of 10 engineers spends 3 whole days shaving off even 30 seconds on a task done by everyone only 5 times a day, we would have gotten a complete return on investment over a period of just 6 months". How did you get 6 months? can you shed some light on the calculation? Thanks!