3 ms·
The complexity with Clojurescript is in the tooling ecosystem. With Clojure , you only have the repl. However, with clojurescript, your have figwheel, shadocljs
by manishsharan 7y ago
The complexity with Clojurescript is in the tooling ecosystem. With Clojure , you only have the repl. However, with clojurescript, your have figwheel, shadocljs etc etc. I gave up on setting that up correctly with my IDE( Visual Studio).
- simongray 7y agoShadow CLJS is very easy to set up and there's a whole book's worth of documentation: https://shadow-cljs.github.io/docs/UsersGuide.html https://shadow-cljs.github.io/docs/UsersGuide.html You don't need figwheel (or any other tool) if you just want to write ClojureScript. You can get a ClojureScript browser REPL like this (mac example): brew install node npm install -g shadow-cljs shadow-cljs browser-repl I get that it's going to be hard if you want to integrate stuff into an IDE that doesn't support ClojureScript. I use IntelliJ with the Cursive plugin (free version) and use `deps.edn` for dependencies since it's supported directly in Cursive.
- didibus 7y agoVisual Studio? First time I hear someone using that for Clojure/Script. Do you mean VSCode or the full on Visual Studio?