4 ms·
Right, but I haven't seen anything to suggest our current testing plans will be universal or frequent enough to really solve this. So testing more is certainly
by ahupp 6y ago
Right, but I haven't seen anything to suggest our current testing plans will be universal or frequent enough to really solve this. So testing more is certainly better than not testing, but without constant testing of non-sick people it's not really going to help much.
"Quantity has a quality all it's own"
- tinus_hn 6y agoThe article specifically is about a solution which would enable enormous amounts of people for cheap, so you can do universal tests.