5 ms·
Sorry, typo. I meant SPR (surface plasmon resonance). I’ve worked at a number of NGS platform companies developing new sequencing approaches. The problem is th
by new299 6y ago
Sorry, typo. I meant SPR (surface plasmon resonance).
I’ve worked at a number of NGS platform companies developing new sequencing approaches. The problem is that sequencing is still expensive at the per-run level. It’s possible to be cost competitive with qPCR if you multiplex samples. But this isn’t ideal.
It would be interesting to create a small/cheap sequencer which could be applied to point-of-care/at-home testing. However, most of the money has gone after attacking the market leader (Illumina) on a cost-per-base, rather than cost-per-run.
A 1USD per-run sequencer would be interesting. But I’ve not seen anything that will hit that target in development. If anyone reading this is developing such a system, let me know, I’d love to get involved.
The idea of a programmable qPCR system is to add some of the versatility of sequencing to qPCR.
- skosuri 6y agoWe've developed something NGS-based we call SwabSeq. You can find out more here: https://www.notion.so/Octant-SwabSeq-Testing-9eb80e793d7e46348038aa80a5a901fd https://www.notion.so/Octant-SwabSeq-Testing-9eb80e793d7e463... You can get to $1/sample; but need >1000 samples/run at least to get to that cost level. Could run 10k/day without automation; likely a lot more (100k-1MM) with automation.
- skosuri 6y agoOh, nvmd. I just saw you wanted a $1/run. Something ONT based perhaps.