2 ms·
I'll assume no negative intent and that English is not your first language, because there's a big difference between calling something "promising" versus "inter
by ping_pong 7y ago
I'll assume no negative intent and that English is not your first language, because there's a big difference between calling something "promising" versus "interesting to look at".
- newacct583 7y agoHow, exactly? In context, a treatment being "interesting to look at" is interesting because you think it might work. Isn't that what "promising" means in the same context? You seem to be hiding behind the presidents imprecision here. I genuinely don't understand how someone could look at the video of that press conference and think the president was not celebrating the idea of possibly finding a cure by injecting disinfectants into people's bodies.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- mattkrause 6y agoI am a native English speaker and would agree that "interesting to look at" is perhaps a little weaker than "promising." Maybe 20% weaker, as if there's a scale. However, the transcript from the NY Times and BBC--not to mention my comment above--also has him saying "a great idea to look at" in the same response, which I do think is equivalent to 'promising'. This is an inevitable consequence of telling others to be careful with their words.