5 ms·
So Amazon especially should have to pick a lane and stay in it should have - why? who is going to go after them? If the risk of doing something shady is pretty
by justaguyhere 6y ago
So Amazon especially should have to pick a lane and stay in it
should have - why? who is going to go after them? If the risk of doing something shady is pretty small but the reward is huge, why wouldn't Amazon do it? Banks do shady stuff all the time, fully knowing the punishment if caught is usually laughably small fine - which they'd pay and keep doing shady stuff.
If the system is rigged (or not strong enough), players will take advantage of it, that is inevitable
- wpietri 6y agoGlass Stegall kept banks in a lane for decades. If we have the will to make laws and enforce it, it won't be too hard.
- dmoy 6y agoI think it was phrased as "should have to", as in someone should make them, not "should have" as in "in hindsight they should have made this decision on their own".