3 ms·
To clarify, I wasn't intending to equate what WD are doing with theft. I was looking for analogy to illustrate the failure in trying to do something bad, trying
by Silhouette 7y ago
To clarify, I wasn't intending to equate what WD are doing with theft. I was looking for analogy to illustrate the failure in trying to do something bad, trying to do essentially the same bad thing but to a slightly lesser degree, and then pretending that admitting to this makes it somehow better while you're still in fact doing the bad thing.
I think "left some information out of their datasheet that is relevant" is being rather kind here. They were advertising these products for one specific purpose, and the change in spec makes them unsuitable for that purpose. They then tried to upsell to a more expensive product that retained the original spec and was still presumably suitable for that purpose in their initial non-apology apology.
I understand the mechanics of how this can happen, but the fact is that this isn't the customer's fault. It's a failure of basic management and leadership skills, and criticising the company for that is entirely fair.
- perl4ever 7y ago"unsuitable for that purpose" "WESTERN DIGITAL DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE"
- Silhouette 7y agoConsumer rights laws in various places now render such statements impotent. You don't get to make claims about what your product is for or how it performs in nice big letters on your website and then hide behind some legal weasel words on page 93 of an agreement no customer is ever likely to read.