I think the argument was that Sweden doesn't have a legal avenue towards general lockdown - only quarantines of specific facilities - and since they assumed eve

I think the argument was that Sweden doesn't have a legal avenue towards general lockdown - only quarantines of specific facilities - and since they assumed everyone was going to get it anyway, voluntary compliance would be good enough, so they didn't regard it as a particular priority to change their law or even constitution. There wasn't any Sweden exceptionalism in the official characterisations I've heard - maybe in the mouths of some redditors.