>> He beat a Clinton in a race for president - that's no mean feat. >> But then he does things like this that reveal he's actually a bit on the dumb side. > T

>> He beat a Clinton in a race for president - that's no mean feat. >> But then he does things like this that reveal he's actually a bit on the dumb side. > The second thing is part of the reason he achieved the first thing. His smarts is knowing what sells to his base, and what consolidates them. > Part of that is saying "dumb" or offensive stuff, with a lining of rhetoric that echoes with their anxieties. I agree and disagree. I think you're right that his "dumbness" helped, but I don't think it was just about saying offensive stuff. It also meant that he was very willing to push polices that were against the status quo consensus (e.g. tariffs [1]), without hemming and hawing. That can appeal strongly to people who feel that the status quo hurts them. It's usually smart to play it safe, which means not straying too far from the status quo and only risk the minimum you think is required for victory. To stray, you either have to be really smart (come up with a brilliant bet no one else sees), or really dumb (not realizing there are safer bets to achieve your goal). Trump was the latter. [1] https://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/01/07/donald-trump-says-he-favors-big-tariffs-on-chinese-exports/ https://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/01/07/dona...