4 ms·
> Also, this fails to explain the _disinfectant_. Not only are there hundreds of doctors in the US who inject disinfectant into people to treat viruses already
by Alex3917 7y ago
> Also, this fails to explain the _disinfectant_.
Not only are there hundreds of doctors in the US who inject disinfectant into people to treat viruses already, there are medical textbooks about it and even an academy for certifying medical practitioners:
https://aaot.us/ https://aaot.us/?
(Technically they advocate taking blood from people, infusing it with disinfectant, and then injecting the infused blood back into people, but close enough.)
I don't know to what extent it's safe or effective, but hundreds of thousands of people have done it without dying at this point and many of them credit it for having healed various problems, so that's something.
- SketchySeaBeast 7y agoThe FDA seems pretty set where the alternative medicine practice of ozone therapy falls in terms of both safety and effectiveness as a medical therapy. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=801.415 https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFR...
- pintxo 7y agoFirst sentence from that source: > Ozone is a toxic gas with no known useful medical application in specific, adjunctive, or preventive therapy. In order for ozone to be effective as a germicide, it must be present in a concentration far greater than that which can be safely tolerated by man and animals.
- Alex3917 7y agoYou want to go through a list of things that various medical associations have been pretty set on and see how well they've held up over time?
- SketchySeaBeast 7y agoThat's not actually an argument, and is like saying "medicine was wrong before, therefore a bleach enema will cure cancer".