4 ms·
In my case it was Q vs R. For what I was trying to achieve and with my level of statistics background R was an obvious choice. The language/runtime AND RStudio
by bitcharmer 7y ago
In my case it was Q vs R. For what I was trying to achieve and with my level of statistics background R was an obvious choice.
The language/runtime AND RStudio are entirely free. Give it a try!
- ryndbfsrw 7y agokdb+ is the only tool I've come across that solidly managed to outperform data.table for data processing. I have huge respect for good Q programmers
- bitcharmer 7y agoLikewise. A good kdb dev is a very rare and intelligent beast, hats off. I'm just too stupid to be able to comprehend much of Kx's ideas and so R was just much more appealing to me.
- anonu 7y agoIn my experience even bad Q programmers can outperform. The language and underlying engine is pretty efficient...