3 ms·

If one had strong reasons to suspect a mechanism by which a vaccine could actually be deadly or fatal, but this mechanism had not been verified explicitly in li

If one had strong reasons to suspect a mechanism by which a vaccine could actually be deadly or fatal, but this mechanism had not been verified explicitly in literature, would they be ethically obligated to warn participants in advance?

chemeng 6y ago
If there is reason to believe it presents a material risk to their health and well-being. Yes.
dehrmann 6y ago
Is this a rhetorical question?