3 ms·
We ask young people to risk their lives often, it's called 'The Army' (and other groups). Also - this would be less risky than going to space. My instinct say
by jariel 7y ago
We ask young people to risk their lives often, it's called 'The Army' (and other groups).
Also - this would be less risky than going to space.
My instinct says >50% of soldiers between 20-30 would instantly volunteer for this. Probably much higher, like 80%. Especially those unmarried.
There would be no lack of fit volunteers.
Its ethically problematic obviously, but so is asking grocery store workers to stock shelves as 'essential workers' during a pandemic when they have no PPE.
I think probably there's a 100% chance that so-called 'essential workers' who are not medical staff will die from Coronavirus due to the pandemic.
The rate of death among the 'very young' is exceedingly low, and I think there were always complications.
If we can narrow it to 19-26 year old, super healthy, without complications ... I think the 'possibility of harm' would be quite low.
It's not beyond the realm of ethical consideration.
Now - remove some ethnical barriers - such as what drug companies used to do by testing drugs in Africa, or what authoritarian governments do all the time (aka China) and you'll have this done in a heartbeat.
I think China/CCP wouldn't think twice about trying this on young men in jail. Is my cynical take.
- jariel 7y agoEdit: I should add, I don't want to leave out other groups of individuals (and non-groups) who would gladly sign up for such an opportunity to help even with some risk. Healthcare workers, Police, probably most veterinarian staff and civil servants as well (!) if they were young and fit. And so many others.
- dehrmann 7y ago> I think China/CCP wouldn't think twice about trying this on young men in jail Or Uyghurs.
- sterlind 7y agoUS soldiers knowingly volunteered to test all manner of chemical horrors in the Edgewood Arsenal experiments, from BZ to VX. you're completely right.