3 ms·
> No, but it’s a trap. If someone answers an obviously rhetorical question, they’re inadvertently demonstrating a predilection for engaging the construction, no
by kerkeslager 7y ago
> No, but it’s a trap. If someone answers an obviously rhetorical question, they’re inadvertently demonstrating a predilection for engaging the construction, not the substance, of a statement, and almost certainly missing the ironic subtext.
That's a pretty self-aggrandizing analysis of the situation.
From my perspective, I got you to make the statement, "People don’t inwardly digest the mistakes of others", which sounds a lot more absurd when you actually say what you mean plainly instead of hiding it in rhetoric.
Maybe some people go through life that way, but that's a pretty poor life strategy and I personally make a pretty big effort to learn from other peoples' mistakes. Maybe I haven't been successful always, but I can point to lots of examples of where I have.
- inopinatus 7y ago> ? "I got you to make the statement" ? That's quite the signal of bad faith debate. I don't think it's my own aggrandizement in play here. Quite the reverse. c.f. remarks passim re. hubris. So there the conversation must end.
- kerkeslager 7y agoThe guy who thinks he "trapped" me with a rhetorical question accuses me of arguing in bad faith? Okay... All I did was get you to say clearly what you believe. If what you believe is so embarrassing that it's a sign of bad faith to get you to say it in clearly, maybe believe better things?