4 ms·
You know its funny how I only see this argument when the service is doing something they agree with. When it's something they don't like there's suddenly outrag
by redml 6y ago
You know its funny how I only see this argument when the service is doing something they agree with. When it's something they don't like there's suddenly outrage.
Remember a few years ago ISPs wanting to remove net neutrality and wanting to potentially charge for access to websites on "their platform"? Suddenly they're big enough to be a "public utility" and "invasion of free speech".
You can't have it both ways.
- akersten 6y agoCompletely different. ISPs are often a government granted monopoly. You can't just up and start one to compete, so it makes sense that they must be neutral. It's not a free market. Anyone can start a YouTube clone, and if enough people disagree with YouTube's policies, they'll come use the clone. That's the free market of ideas. See: Reddit/Voat