5 ms·
I think the original title is better, although dropping "full-fledged next-generation" would be an even better choice. > A comparison of three programming lang
by nemetroid 7y ago
I think the original title is better, although dropping "full-fledged next-generation" would be an even better choice.
> A comparison of three programming languages for a full-fledged next-generation sequencing tool
- Magnap 7y ago"next-generation sequencing" is a term of art in this case
- nemetroid 7y agoI see, it sounded like a buzzword term (which I guess it still might be). The point is that the current title makes it sound like a general comparison, while the original title makes it clear that it's comparing three implementations of a single tool.