4 ms·
Is it not plausible that this is just a concerned person speaking out? Why go straight for the most cynical take?
by mwcampbell 7y ago
Is it not plausible that this is just a concerned person speaking out? Why go straight for the most cynical take?
- tlrobinson 7y agoWell, it’s clearly in response to isbgpsafeyet.com, since iscloudflaresafeyet.com was registered 2 days after the former was launched by CloudFlare https://blog.cloudflare.com/is-bgp-safe-yet-rpki-routing-security-initiative/ https://blog.cloudflare.com/is-bgp-safe-yet-rpki-routing-sec...
- zymhan 7y agoI mean they literally ripped off the header design of the original Cloudflare-run BGP site. That alone makes it clear they're responding that original post, and not out of some random desire to inform people of CloudFlare's design issues.
- mwcampbell 7y agoThe fact that they're using smart campaign tactics doesn't imply that they're a competitor firing back rather than a concerned person taking advantage of the opportunity to draw attention to the things that concern them.
- sgammon 7y agois it you are you “they”
- mwcampbell 7y agoNo. I was just responding to what I think is an excess of cynicism toward an unknown individual.
- zymhan 7y agoOh please, the "is cloudflare safe" site is peak cynicism. Not sure how you can look past that point and then call everyone else a cynic.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]