> By whose authority can these conceptions be labelled as misconceptions? By whose authority can they be labelled as true? > If art is neither beautiful nor c

> By whose authority can these conceptions be labelled as misconceptions? By whose authority can they be labelled as true? > If art is neither beautiful nor crafted or good in any way, and also has no meaning, it can be argued that it also has no intrinsic value. There is no such thing as intrinsic value in anything, least of all art. > In that case it is merely an object that is meant to inspire pompous rambling, but so can any object if put on display for the right observers, like in an art exhibit. Really any object? Or would some objects work better than others? Why? Does it depend on the audience? These are actually exactly the questions that postmodern art explores.