3 ms·
The author spends an entire article demonstrating that he or she does not understand what an MVP is, then proceeding to tell us about a new invention that is, i
by santoshalper 7y ago
The author spends an entire article demonstrating that he or she does not understand what an MVP is, then proceeding to tell us about a new invention that is, in fact, an MVP.
Newsflash - an MVP is not a piece of shit. It's the simplest version of the product that solves the problem.
- richardjennings 7y agoIt seems "Simple, Lovable and Complete" is the authors context specific meaning of the Viable in MVP
- pdubs1 7y agoIt also seems really dumb, to me, for incorporating "Love" into a business/engineering product/project stage-of-development naming convention. Any good business person or engineer understands that objective, unbiased, un-emotionally attached decisions and validations are antithetical to subjective, biased emotions such as "love".