> We should do exactly what the OP says because that's the whole point of news outlets. Not really. The whole point of news outlets is to provide information f

> We should do exactly what the OP says because that's the whole point of news outlets. Not really. The whole point of news outlets is to provide information for you to process. It makes no sense to leave out any objective reasoning from the task to jump into whitelisting or blacklist entire publications based on whether you were able to point any random issue somewhere in the past. Either the information is valid or accurate, or it isn't. It makes zero sense to claim that the work of author X should be blindly ignored just because you found an issue with a single piece written by author Y years ago.