5 ms·

SIMD support is being worked on as far as I know, and this is a problem where there is room for a lot of improvement in the future. Generally interfacing betwee

SIMD support is being worked on as far as I know, and this is a problem where there is room for a lot of improvement in the future. Generally interfacing between programming languages and systems efficiently, without too much data conversion/memory management is a harder problem than adding more low level programming support.

throwaway483284 7y ago
I don't think SIMD support will help here, a lot of encoder/decoder code base is hand written ASM.
- roblabla 7y ago
  There's no reason to think it won't help - the encoder/decoder code base could be written in WASM directly to ensure it uses the SIMD instructions, and those will hopefully map closely to the machine SIMD instructions. Of course though, you're right that it'll still incur a performance penalty.
  - londons_explore 7y ago
    Someone needs to make a dev environment where someone can write WASM and see realtime the generated assembly instructions, together with the number of cycles to execute. That way, the developer can tweak the input to the compiler to get exactly the sequence of instructions they wanted. They can also hand write the output assembly, and put a patch in to the compiler saying "this generated assembly is faster that what you generated, so please generate this in the next version".
snazz 7y ago
Yes, it looks like WASM SIMD has already shipped in V8. There are some impressive demos on this page: https://v8.dev/features/simd https://v8.dev/features/simd
- londons_explore 7y ago
  It's kinda lame that none of those demos even run at 60fps, let alone 120fps on mobile for a real smooth experience, with lots of performance headroom for more than a single feature at once...