3 ms·
The way i see it, software which is truly part of the distribution can and should still be packaged the traditional way. But snap/flatpak creates a standard way
by twic 7y ago
The way i see it, software which is truly part of the distribution can and should still be packaged the traditional way. But snap/flatpak creates a standard way to install software which is not really part of the distribution. It replaces all the random tarballs and unpacking things in /opt that you occasionally had to do when installing third-party software. It makes sense for VS Code, IntelliJ, Slack, Chrome, etc, to be in snap/flatpak.
It doesn't make sense for open-source software built with traditional tools by the distribution maintainers themselves to be in snap/flatpak.
I note that on Ubuntu 18, snapd itself is distributed as a snap, which seems like a very poor idea to me.
- mceachen 7y ago> snapd itself is distributed as a snap, which seems like a very poor idea to me I took this as a "vote of confidence" that snap could self-host snapd. Hosting via snap means they can push updates and not have to wait for users to `apt update; apt upgrade`, as snaps auto-upgrade without user intervention. I don't know of other benefits, though.