3 ms·
> is rarely a choice between a corrupt politician and a non-corrupt one 2008? 2012? Can't say that I've heard (m)any corruption allegations against Obama. 201
by zimpenfish 7y ago
> is rarely a choice between a corrupt politician and a non-corrupt one
2008? 2012? Can't say that I've heard (m)any corruption allegations against Obama.
2016? I mean, I don't think a single charge of corruption or malfeasance ever turned out to be true for Hillary Clinton, has it?
Unless you mean "corrupt" in the sense of "non-pure" and, yeah, 99.9$ people who have enough money to be politicians are distinctly "non-pure". Now if you want to get the money out of politics, it'll need consistent Democrat gains at every level down to local council for the next 20 years to move SCOTUS left and undo all the dark money idiocies of the Roberts' court.