4 ms·
> Hugo is different in that it basically just transforms local HTML/Templates/Markdown. That's always fast. Even JS can handle that. Do you know of any benchma
by seanwilson 7y ago
> Hugo is different in that it basically just transforms local HTML/Templates/Markdown. That's always fast. Even JS can handle that.
Do you know of any benchmarks that show that? As far as I know, most static site generators can take minutes to process a few thousand Markdown files with Hugo being the exception.