3 ms·
If I understand it correctly the groups had their risk of hazard adjusted, i.e., there was some estimative of the expected outcome if the HC wasn't used. Well,
by woliveirajr 7y ago
If I understand it correctly the groups had their risk of hazard adjusted, i.e., there was some estimative of the expected outcome if the HC wasn't used.
Well, the HC adjust factor was 2.61, i.e., it was expected to have 2.61 more deaths than the no-HC group. So 11.4% x 2.61 = 29.75% and the final death rate in the group was 27.8%. It might not be an improvement but it doesn't seem to be something that killed the patients. Or where I'm wrong ?