> Anyone know more of these cities, where it'd be obvious to the ancient inhabitants that it was the same city? According to your definition if there are recog

> Anyone know more of these cities, where it'd be obvious to the ancient inhabitants that it was the same city? According to your definition if there are recognizable major natural landmarks ( "Mount Ararat", "river Hrazdan" ), then it means nothing has changed since people in the past would recognize it and be able to place themselves. So using your logic, any city near a major mountain, river, etc would be recognizable. So tokyo ( visible from Mt Fuji ) hasn't changed, manhattan hasn't changed ( hudson/east rivers ), seattle hasn't changed ( Mt Rainier ), etc.