4 ms·
What about the example of driving a car with manual transmission? (I admit that's not the most relatable thing everywhere in the world, still). I'd argue most e
by MauranKilom 7y ago
What about the example of driving a car with manual transmission? (I admit that's not the most relatable thing everywhere in the world, still). I'd argue most experienced manual drivers are good at it when we talk about normal traffic (where the skill ceiling just isn't very high).
Try and ask a manual driver when/how they shift. Maybe they will give you rough speed numbers, but that's not really how they do it. Despite knowing very well when they have to shift in their own car, they won't be able to articulate/communicate it in a helpful way. It's become muscle memory guided by sound, haptics, speed perception and timings.
Your clutch and transmission will let you know the difference between good and bad very clearly. You practice "good" a lot. You know how to do it. But you can't articulate it.
One could argue that the scenario in question precludes the possibility to "excel". But the striking difference between "new driver learning a manual" and "experienced driver shifting without spending even a sliver of conscious though on it" is a clear separation of "bad" from "good" (not just "mediocre") and should suffice as counterexample to "if you can't articulate it, you're mediocre".
- smogcutter 7y agoIt seems to me like the disagreement here comes down to the difference between “good” and “good enough”. For a lot of habitual, daily life type skills like driving, good enough is usually fine. You don’t need to be Senna to commute in a 5 speed. Most people are middling/mediocre drivers, and that’s okay! At the same time, I’ll submit that any competent manual driver should be able to sit in the passenger seat and diagnose when a learner is popping the clutch, lugging the engine, etc. If someone can’t, their own driving is probably faulty in ways they aren’t aware of.
- phkahler 7y ago>> It seems to me like the disagreement here comes down to the difference between “good” and “good enough”. Yeah, theres a wide range and a lot of possible words to use. Good enough, Good, Great. Most importantly I think all of those are in contrast to someone who is "bad" at something and the other words to describe that end of the range of ability.