3 ms·
> (3) is incorrect, Gatsby initial page load times are mostly really bad. This has not been my experience, considering all HTML is ready to go from last byte s
by tomnipotent 7y ago
> (3) is incorrect, Gatsby initial page load times are mostly really bad.
This has not been my experience, considering all HTML is ready to go from last byte so that other than blocking CSS, rendering can begin ASAP. At this point, no JS is required to interact with the page so things are generally pretty snappy while we wait for React hydrate to kick in.
- Touche 7y agoPick a few random sites from the Gatsby showcase on their homepage and run them through webpagetest.org Simple Testing.
- tomnipotent 7y agoshopflamingo.com, ideo.com, ca.braun.com, and bejamas.io are all blazingly fast for me.
- Touche 7y agoYou mean your computer or on webpagetest.org?
- davidwparker 7y agoIdeo has a pretty bad insight score (41): https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ideo.com%2F https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=... First paint: 4.1 Seconds. Time to interactive: 11.5 Seconds. I wouldn't say that's very fast. Edit: I didn't check the other three.
- davedx 7y agoshopflamingo.com gets 47 ca.braun.com gets 77 bejamas.io gets 96 So implementation dependent I guess