3 ms·
Absolutely a true statement, but it should also be noted that WG 14 tends to be more accepting of proposals that have working extension(s) in a major compiler.
by hermitdev 6y ago
Absolutely a true statement, but it should also be noted that WG 14 tends to be more accepting of proposals that have working extension(s) in a major compiler.
- pjmlp 6y agoWell, that wasn't enough to rescue Annex K, nor to have a way to solve the impending adoption issues.
- wahern 6y agoWhich vendor fully implemented Annex K? For several years after C11 was published no vendor fully implemented Annex K, not even the sponsor, Microsoft. I haven't checked in awhile so maybe things have changed.
- pjmlp 6y agoWell just like here, what clang is implementing with _ExtInt doesn't mean it is what N2472 will look like in the end. Just like Annex K turned out to look a bit different than what Microsoft sponsored. Which are still available to Windows developers. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/security-enhanced-versions-of-crt-functions?view=vs-2019 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/secur...