5 ms·

I just found out about C18 thanks to your comment, I was still at C11. Thanks. Anyway I think you're right, except for the fact that I don't like when language

by GTP 7y ago

I just found out about C18 thanks to your comment, I was still at C11. Thanks. Anyway I think you're right, except for the fact that I don't like when language designers release versions too quickly. I don't know the situation in the C++ land, but as an example I think that Java took the wrong way.

jcelerier 7y ago
> but as an example I think that Java took the wrong way. I wonder what is the right way then ? Java is apparently too fast for you, and yet it gets improvements so slowly that it is getting its marketshare eaten by other JVM languages moving much faster. If it was even slower it could as well be put directly next to the dusty COBOL and RPG boxes in the IBM attic.
- saagarjha 7y ago
  This is recent, though. The releases of Java 1-7 were fairly slow and conservative.
- pjmlp 7y ago
  Dusty Cobol?!? https://www.microfocus.com/en-us/products/visual-cobol/overview https://www.microfocus.com/en-us/products/visual-cobol/overv... The lastest standard revision is from 2018, and you can even do OOP if you feel so inclined.
- GTP 7y ago
  I think that language designers should release a new version when they actually have something new and not because somebody decided that there has to be a new version every x months. Also I think that the popularity of other JVM languages, eg. Kotlin, derives not from their quick releases, but from the fact that they observed what programmers didn't like about Java and designed the language from the start keeping in mind those problems and addreesing them right from the beginning.
hermitdev 7y ago
Since C++11, the ISO committee has been aiming for a new standard release every 3 years. So far, they've kept this cadence up. I don't recall if C++20 is actually out yet, but I know the feature set was finalized last year, if not out yet, it's probably just due to editorial issues (I've not been using C++ for work the last few years, so my knowledge might be a bit dated).
SloopJon 7y ago
There's something to be said for the new Java approach of releasing often, with a stable LTS release every now and then, even if Oracle is muddying the waters with their licensing. The only release after 8 that interests me right now is 11. Meanwhile, the features of Java 12, 13, and 14 are available for people who do want to experiment with them. I think we'll see this implicitly with C++. C++11 and the mostly non-controversial updates in C++14 comprise "modern" C++, whereas adoption of C++17 seems to be a bit slower.

by GTP 7y ago

jcelerier 7y ago

> but as an example I think that Java took the wrong way. I wonder what is the right way then ? Java is apparently too fast for you, and yet it gets improvements so slowly that it is getting its marketshare eaten by other JVM languages moving much faster. If it was even slower it could as well be put directly next to the dusty COBOL and RPG boxes in the IBM attic.

saagarjha 7y ago
This is recent, though. The releases of Java 1-7 were fairly slow and conservative.
pjmlp 7y ago
Dusty Cobol?!? https://www.microfocus.com/en-us/products/visual-cobol/overview https://www.microfocus.com/en-us/products/visual-cobol/overv... The lastest standard revision is from 2018, and you can even do OOP if you feel so inclined.
GTP 7y ago
I think that language designers should release a new version when they actually have something new and not because somebody decided that there has to be a new version every x months. Also I think that the popularity of other JVM languages, eg. Kotlin, derives not from their quick releases, but from the fact that they observed what programmers didn't like about Java and designed the language from the start keeping in mind those problems and addreesing them right from the beginning.

hermitdev 7y ago

Since C++11, the ISO committee has been aiming for a new standard release every 3 years. So far, they've kept this cadence up. I don't recall if C++20 is actually out yet, but I know the feature set was finalized last year, if not out yet, it's probably just due to editorial issues (I've not been using C++ for work the last few years, so my knowledge might be a bit dated).

SloopJon 7y ago

There's something to be said for the new Java approach of releasing often, with a stable LTS release every now and then, even if Oracle is muddying the waters with their licensing. The only release after 8 that interests me right now is 11. Meanwhile, the features of Java 12, 13, and 14 are available for people who do want to experiment with them. I think we'll see this implicitly with C++. C++11 and the mostly non-controversial updates in C++14 comprise "modern" C++, whereas adoption of C++17 seems to be a bit slower.