4 ms·
I'm explicitly not making claims about the origin of the virus. The only "conspiracy" is that you're racist for demanding answers. Neither of your articles p
by Consultant32452 7y ago
I'm explicitly not making claims about the origin of the virus. The only "conspiracy" is that you're racist for demanding answers.
Neither of your articles provides a blanket denial that the lab was involved in research that included the virus. It only makes some very narrow denials in non-scientific language.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- SketchySeaBeast 7y agoWell in that case that seems entirely philosophical, and entirely out of place with the other two claims, which can actually have results. But you do seem to be arguing for the theory as well.
- Consultant32452 7y agoI ask you about A. You respond with B, a tiny subset of A. I ask you for the rest of A. Rather than saying something even as innocuous as "I don't know" you call me a racist. In the most technical sense you might not be lying about B. But you're definitely being dishonest with the presumptive accusation of racism. And you're definitely using deceptive language to avoid answering the question. And you've definitely destroyed your credibility on a scale equal to "Masks don't work."
- SketchySeaBeast 7y agoWhen outlined like that, it's totally fair to doubt, assuming that's the only or primary defense. Do you have some links to mainstream media outlets directly correlating questioning origin as being racist?