> I'm not sure if you read the thread's link before responding but they're proposing using smoking as a treatment vector I did read it, at no point did I see t

> I'm not sure if you read the thread's link before responding but they're proposing using smoking as a treatment vector I did read it, at no point did I see them proposing smoking as treatment. Rather, they're proposing nicotine patches. > There's a long history of immoral science occurring during periods of national and international strife, so I believe oversight, harm reduction, and due diligence remain important considerations. Even if it was administered by smoking, nicotine would be about as safe a drug as you can find at that dose. You'd be hard pressed to find a case where somebody died upon smoking their first cigarette. Aspirin, Paracetamol or Ibuprofin are way more dangerous than that. It would be undue diligence not to investigate this potential treatment vector, even if it turns out to be some weird statistical artifact.