4 ms·
"The virus is created in a lab" is not a conspiracy theory, it is just a plausible possibility that we should study. There is no "conspiracy" in the theory in
by pritovido 6y ago
"The virus is created in a lab" is not a conspiracy theory, it is just a plausible possibility that we should study.
There is no "conspiracy" in the theory in fact. The most probable cause is an accident. Nobody is going to create it as a weapon without creating the vaccine first.
We should not be "accepting" any prejudice, the one that "favors" US administration, or the opposite one, but we should be studding and working around evidence.
By the way, if it actually was an accident, accepting that it was a natural phenomenon favors the interest of China administration too.
It can't be natural, even accepting China's side's theory of the market, it would be made by human intervention mixing in the market bats with Armadillos.
- chvid 6y agoBut it has been examined and the virus traces back to animals and earlier strains which were not as contagious. This is one of the many papers on the subject: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9 So why are we still discussing this? Because we are being manipulated.
- papermachete 6y agoYou don't just publish a study and have it cemented as fact to end all other studies.
- chvid 6y agoIt is no just one paper. There are plenty of peer reviewed papers out there, published in reputable outlets, that analyzes the origin of the virus and none of them indicate that it is artificially made.
- wayneftw 6y agoIt doesn't have to be artificially "made". It could still be "fostered" in a lab.