4 ms·

Methods of discovering and promoting new music change over time, especially compared to the peak days of a niche electronic music artist in the 90s. Tik Tok is

Methods of discovering and promoting new music change over time, especially compared to the peak days of a niche electronic music artist in the 90s. Tik Tok is an absolutely massive recent source of new music growth [0], Taylor Swift and Beiber are absolutely massive artists with almost unparalleled influence across multiple genres, their riding of new vibes throws off tsunami wave effects. They’re doing their job, and doing it well, the effects of giving their first 10 in a decade to Fiona Apple’s new album for example, you’re just not the target. 0 - https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/tiktok-video-app-growth-867587/ https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/tiktok-vid...

twic 6y ago
What influence does Justin Bieber have across multiple genres?
- readarticle 6y ago
  One simple example is his feature on the Despacito remix that completely and utterly dominated 2017, a solid year+ before Drake & Bad Bunny “started” the recent trend of huge English language artists featuring on Spanish language tracks and vice versa, that’s Latin pop, reggaeton, pop, and rap right there alone. Don’t let that imply Drake isn’t even more influential though, man almost single handedly brought the sound of West Africa -> London onto American radio.
  - anthk 6y ago
    Just like Enrique Iglesias or Shakira.
maze-le 6y ago
So... you think Aphex Twin is a niche electronic music artist of the 90s and at the same time claim Taylor Swift and Beiber have "almost unparalleled influence". I mean... musical taste has its variations and I am cool with that but this is objectively an exaggeration.
- readarticle 6y ago
  In general, they’re niche. Their peak was in the 90s but they’re not of the 90s, I’m not trying to call them Sugar Ray. This is all in terms of listeners and quantity, not taste and quality, in line with Pitchfork’s target moving. And it’s definitely exaggerated, but mostly because Taylor Swift and Beiber were the slightly dated examples given. Nicely emblematic though.
  - whatok 6y ago
    Aphex Twin is not a "they" and he's probably more prolific on a larger scale now than he ever was.
l33tbro 6y ago
> Taylor Swift and Beiber are absolutely massive artists with almost unparalleled influence across multiple genres. Massive like Rick Astley? Hootie and the Blowfish? Your argument attributes artistic quality with an artist and their machine's size and reach. I'm sorry, but this doesn't justify critical notice or attention. As for their influence - I'm at a loss for what you mean here. What genres are these two artists influencing - other than pop? Maaaybe hip-hop with their use of the millenial whoop [1] - but even that is a stretch. > their riding of new vibes throws off tsunami wave effects. This is what Madonna, MJ and basically every mainstream artist has done for eons - co-opting genres and trends to remain relevant (Kenny Rogers even did disco). > you’re just not the target. Thanks for the patronizing tone. As a DJ, signed artist and music nerd of more than 20 years, I think I understand a little about the nuances of this stuff. I actually used Aphex as I thought it may be relatable to a tech crowd, but I could have said a number of artists (new or old) from many different genres to make the point. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennial_whoop https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennial_whoop
- readarticle 6y ago
  Your argument attributes artistic quality with an artist and their machine's size and reach. I didn’t mention or consider artistic quality in my comment, and didn’t mean to suggest popularity is quality. This from the website that built an empire on discovering and promoting new music... Is what I originally replied to, if “new music” implied quality music, than this is a miscommunication.
beat 6y ago
Popular isn't the same as influential. For a good example of "unparalleled influence", look at the Velvet Underground. They hardly sold any copies of their first album, but as (I think) Brian Eno observed, "Everyone who bought that album started a band". Velvet Underground and Nico is arguably one of the ten most important rock albums ever made. Maybe, fifty years from now, we'll look back on that first Taylor Swift album as world-changing. But I doubt it. Talented? Yes, remarkably so. But I don't hear a "Heroin" or "Venus in Furs" level change in the very nature of music there.

twic 6y ago

What influence does Justin Bieber have across multiple genres?

readarticle 6y ago
One simple example is his feature on the Despacito remix that completely and utterly dominated 2017, a solid year+ before Drake & Bad Bunny “started” the recent trend of huge English language artists featuring on Spanish language tracks and vice versa, that’s Latin pop, reggaeton, pop, and rap right there alone. Don’t let that imply Drake isn’t even more influential though, man almost single handedly brought the sound of West Africa -> London onto American radio.
- anthk 6y ago
  Just like Enrique Iglesias or Shakira.

maze-le 6y ago

So... you think Aphex Twin is a niche electronic music artist of the 90s and at the same time claim Taylor Swift and Beiber have "almost unparalleled influence". I mean... musical taste has its variations and I am cool with that but this is objectively an exaggeration.

readarticle 6y ago
In general, they’re niche. Their peak was in the 90s but they’re not of the 90s, I’m not trying to call them Sugar Ray. This is all in terms of listeners and quantity, not taste and quality, in line with Pitchfork’s target moving. And it’s definitely exaggerated, but mostly because Taylor Swift and Beiber were the slightly dated examples given. Nicely emblematic though.
- whatok 6y ago
  Aphex Twin is not a "they" and he's probably more prolific on a larger scale now than he ever was.

l33tbro 6y ago

> Taylor Swift and Beiber are absolutely massive artists with almost unparalleled influence across multiple genres. Massive like Rick Astley? Hootie and the Blowfish? Your argument attributes artistic quality with an artist and their machine's size and reach. I'm sorry, but this doesn't justify critical notice or attention. As for their influence - I'm at a loss for what you mean here. What genres are these two artists influencing - other than pop? Maaaybe hip-hop with their use of the millenial whoop [1] - but even that is a stretch. > their riding of new vibes throws off tsunami wave effects. This is what Madonna, MJ and basically every mainstream artist has done for eons - co-opting genres and trends to remain relevant (Kenny Rogers even did disco). > you’re just not the target. Thanks for the patronizing tone. As a DJ, signed artist and music nerd of more than 20 years, I think I understand a little about the nuances of this stuff. I actually used Aphex as I thought it may be relatable to a tech crowd, but I could have said a number of artists (new or old) from many different genres to make the point. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennial_whoop https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennial_whoop

readarticle 6y ago
Your argument attributes artistic quality with an artist and their machine's size and reach. I didn’t mention or consider artistic quality in my comment, and didn’t mean to suggest popularity is quality. This from the website that built an empire on discovering and promoting new music... Is what I originally replied to, if “new music” implied quality music, than this is a miscommunication.

beat 6y ago

Popular isn't the same as influential. For a good example of "unparalleled influence", look at the Velvet Underground. They hardly sold any copies of their first album, but as (I think) Brian Eno observed, "Everyone who bought that album started a band". Velvet Underground and Nico is arguably one of the ten most important rock albums ever made. Maybe, fifty years from now, we'll look back on that first Taylor Swift album as world-changing. But I doubt it. Talented? Yes, remarkably so. But I don't hear a "Heroin" or "Venus in Furs" level change in the very nature of music there.