> [O]ne could just as easily label top universities with high scholastic admissions requirements to be “inequitable”, and thus unacceptable. The opposite was r

> [O]ne could just as easily label top universities with high scholastic admissions requirements to be “inequitable”, and thus unacceptable. The opposite was recently litigated - that top universities were inequitable because they didnt sufficiently consider scholastic achievement: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/26/us/politics/yale-asian-americans-discrimination-investigation.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/26/us/politics/yale-asian-am... https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/01/harvard-ruling-admissions-racial-bias-asian-americans-latest https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/01/harvard-ruli...