No, the opposite is likely a better solution. Instead of local funding for schools change it so that all funding for schools goes to a single pool, in the U.S.

No, the opposite is likely a better solution. Instead of local funding for schools change it so that all funding for schools goes to a single pool, in the U.S. it would need to be a State pool, and then split it out based on school population. That way we eliminate the "ghetto schools" problem of being underfunded while the "Beverly Hills" type schools are awash in funds. Any donations to schools, also go to the general fund. It totally unfair that where you live literally down to what side of the street can mean the difference between a good or terribly funded school you must attend.