5 ms·
The most effective anti-fraud solution would be a major privacy violation just by the nature of anti-fraud itself. So, since the stripe user is the one being ch
by jsf01 6y ago
The most effective anti-fraud solution would be a major privacy violation just by the nature of anti-fraud itself. So, since the stripe user is the one being charged for disputes anyway, giving them control over how much more privacy to give up in exchange for better protection is completely obvious. Even if the default is to be extremely pervasive as Stripe’s anti-fraud measures are now, the option to reduce that tracking is a must.
- Ensorceled 6y agoWho do you mean as “the stripe user”? As a customer of a website using Stripe, I have very little concern for fraud, MasterCard and Visa protect me quite well. As a website operator who has somebody use a stolen credit card on my site, MC and Visa protect the owner of the stolen credit card quite well. Stripe is protecting both the website operator and the real owner of the credit card.
- jsf01 6y agoThe person responsible for paying for the dispute. The user who goes to create an account on stripe.com to allow them to sell stuff on their site.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- Ensorceled 6y agoHaving done some anti-fraud work in the past... that is Not something I would turn off for some over wrought privacy concerns. There is a reason for the GDPR exemptions for this.
- luckylion 6y agoWhat GDPR exemptions are you referring to?
- bastawhiz 6y agoYou can opt out of Stripe.js, but then you must accept the burden of being PCI compliant (or instead chose to use a hosted Stripe flow).