> Honestly, who has 1-1.5h to read this without skimming through most of the verbiage to tease out the point? I’m not trying to flex on you, but it didn’t take

> Honestly, who has 1-1.5h to read this without skimming through most of the verbiage to tease out the point? I’m not trying to flex on you, but it didn’t take me nearly that long to read it. And it really does not demonstrate good faith on your part to come here and tear down patio11 without even doing the basic due diligence of actually reading the damn thing you’re commenting on first.