4 ms·
You trade known deployment problems for unknown infra management problems. You reduce the complexity of contribution significantly. If you’re at a company that
by dfee 6y ago
You trade known deployment problems for unknown infra management problems. You reduce the complexity of contribution significantly.
If you’re at a company that wants to manage K8s, and you’ve chosen to invest in that direction, then serverless doesn’t make a lot of sense.
If your customers aren’t buying compute, then you should be wary of large investments that are outside your core focus.
Sure, there are quite a few problems with lambdas. But the abstraction you’re working at is much more atomic. And you don’t need FTEs to manage K8s and introduce a completely new set of problems.
Less is more (is the argument).
- manigandham 6y agoYou don't need serverless/FaaS for that. PaaS has existed for a long time, and many providers will now let you run any container image which is a lot more portable than custom frameworks. Zeit v1 actually did this.