5 ms·
Exactly. They even mentioned it in the article. Two leads disagreeing on how to get work done is never a good thing no matter where you work if they can't get t
by stuff4ben 7y ago
Exactly. They even mentioned it in the article. Two leads disagreeing on how to get work done is never a good thing no matter where you work if they can't get to consensus.
- sq_ 7y agoSeems especially true for quantum computing. So many different, untested ways to get to the end goal, to the point where members of a group could all have perfectly valid reasoning as to why their particular method is the only one that will work.
- ISL 7y agoIn that case, if you have the resources, you find both.
- CydeWeys 7y agoYou may have the money, but not the talent. I can't imagine there are that many cutting edge quantum computing researchers out there. Talk about a niche field.
- skapadia 7y agoLOL - isn't that the very nature of quantum computing itself? "A quantum computer works with particles that can be in superposition. Rather than representing bits — such particles would represent qubits, which can take on the value 0, or 1, or both simultaneously" (https://plus.maths.org/content/how-does-quantum-commuting-wo... https://plus.maths.org/content/how-does-quantum-commuting-wo...) "The principle of quantum superposition states that if a physical system may be in one of many configurations—arrangements of particles or fields—then the most general state is a combination of all of these possibilities, where the amount in each configuration is specified by a complex number." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition)
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- techslave 7y agobut this is quantum. you take both approaches.